From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mangels v. Inc. Village of Rockville Centre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 1946
270 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

April 15, 1946.


In an action for a declaratory judgment that a zoning ordinance as it affects plaintiff is void, to restrain his prosecution for alleged violation of the ordinance, etc., order restraining defendant from proceeding in an action in the local police court, pendente lite, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. A court of equity may restrain the prosecution of a criminal action in an exceptional case where irreparable injury may result, where the application presents only a question of law, and where a clear legal right to the relief is established. ( Reed v. Littleton, 275 N.Y. 150; Mills Novelty Co. v. Sunderman, 266 N.Y. 32.) Such requirements are not satisfied by the showing in this case. Lewis, P.J., Johnston, Adel, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mangels v. Inc. Village of Rockville Centre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 1946
270 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Mangels v. Inc. Village of Rockville Centre

Case Details

Full title:HENRY MANGELS, Respondent, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Commander Oil v. Town of Oyster Bay

However, before that occurrence the papers in this proceeding and action were served upon the defendants. The…