From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mandile v. Deshotel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 16, 2017
151 A.D.3d 1813 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

06-16-2017

In the Matter of Mark A. MANDILE, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Katrina V. DESHOTEL, Respondent–Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.).

Pro Bono Appeals Program, Albany, Hancock Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (James P. Youngs of Counsel), for respondent-appellant. Terrence C. Brown–Steiner, East Rochester, for petitioner-respondent.


Pro Bono Appeals Program, Albany, Hancock Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (James P. Youngs of Counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Terrence C. Brown–Steiner, East Rochester, for petitioner-respondent.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Deshotel v. Mandile (Appeal No. 1), ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2017 WL 2604482 (June 16, 2017).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mandile v. Deshotel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 16, 2017
151 A.D.3d 1813 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Mandile v. Deshotel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Mark A. MANDILE, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Katrina V…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 16, 2017

Citations

151 A.D.3d 1813 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
54 N.Y.S.3d 348