From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mandell v. Grosfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 1976
54 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

October 28, 1976


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 23, 1975, dismissing the complaint herein, after trial before Schwartz, J., and a jury, unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Plaintiff failed to establish fraud in the sale by him of a purchase money second mortgage to defendant, Grosfeld's nominee for approximately two thirds of the face value thereof. The portion of the proceeds received from the city which was allocated to satisfy the subject mortgage was nothing more than a rehabilitation loan from the city, which was to be repaid. We have examined the several contentions urged by plaintiff hereon and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Silverman, Capozzoli, Nunez and Yesawich, JJ.


Summaries of

Mandell v. Grosfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 28, 1976
54 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Mandell v. Grosfeld

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MANDELL, as Executor of HARRY MANDELL, Deceased, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Mandell v. Grosfeld

The defendants then included those portions of the record in their own appendix, which was helpful to the…