From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mandel v. Schoenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Order granting plaintiff's motion to open default and to restore case to calendar reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave, however, to plaintiff to apply to the Supreme Court, upon a proper showing of merits, for permission to renew the motion to open her default, which motion was denied by the order theretofore granted on the 15th day of October, 1928. The fact that defective papers were submitted on behalf of the plaintiff on the first application is no excuse for making a new application without leave. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mandel v. Schoenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Mandel v. Schoenfeld

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH MANDEL, an Infant, by RACHEL MANDEL, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)