From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manda v. Badinsky

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Feb 16, 2022
No. 2022-61871 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2022-61871 Motion 2018-00399 QC

02-16-2022

John Manda and Eva Manda, Respondents, v. Ivan Badinsky, Appellant, et al., Undertenants.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J. MICHELLE WESTON, CHEREE A. BUGGS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered December 13, 2017. By decision and order of this court dated May 17, 2021, on the court's own motion, this court ordered the parties to the appeal, or their attorneys, and the persons interested in the estate of the deceased party thereto, to show cause before this court why an order should not be made pursuant to CPLR 1021, dismissing the appeal for failure to effect a timely substitution by filing an affidavit or affirmation on that issue with the Clerk of this court on or before June 21, 2021. More than eight months have elapsed since the order was issued, and no affidavit or affirmation has been filed.

On the court's own motion it is

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed (see CPLR 1021).


Summaries of

Manda v. Badinsky

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Feb 16, 2022
No. 2022-61871 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Manda v. Badinsky

Case Details

Full title:John Manda and Eva Manda, Respondents, v. Ivan Badinsky, Appellant, et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-61871 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 16, 2022)