From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mancuso v. Ungerland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

March, 1934.


Judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The evidence discloses that defendant's car, just before the accident, was being driven fast; that the headlights on defendant's car were bright and strong enough to dazzle Frey. The night was foggy and the pavement wet and slippery. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant in driving his car under the circumstances shown or that such negligence, if found, did not contribute to the accident. A question for the jury was presented. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mancuso v. Ungerland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Mancuso v. Ungerland

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES MANCUSO, as Administratrix, etc., of ANGELO MANCUSO, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)