From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mancuso v. Bd. of Educ. of Schenectady City

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 8, 1955
128 N.E.2d 422 (N.Y. 1955)

Opinion

Argued April 27, 1955

Decided July 8, 1955

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Schenectady County, ELSWORTH, J.

Ettore Mancuso, appellant in person.

Orrin G. Judd, Abraham S. Clayman and Earle K. Moore for respondent.

Daniel E. Kelly for Board of Education of the Rye City School District, amicus curiae, in support of respondent's position.

Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General ( Henry S. Manley, Ruth Kessler Toch and Milton Alpert of counsel), in his statutory capacity under section 71 of the Executive Law.



Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.


Summaries of

Mancuso v. Bd. of Educ. of Schenectady City

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 8, 1955
128 N.E.2d 422 (N.Y. 1955)
Case details for

Mancuso v. Bd. of Educ. of Schenectady City

Case Details

Full title:ETTORE MANCUSO, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHENECTADY CITY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 8, 1955

Citations

128 N.E.2d 422 (N.Y. 1955)
128 N.E.2d 422

Citing Cases

Redlich v. Capri Cinema

Reels of Super 8 mm. Film, 413 U.S. 123, 130, n. 7 [1973]). Indeed, if at all possible, a statute is required…

People v. Wright

A clear usurpation by the Legislature of prohibited power must be found before a statute can be pronounced…