From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mancus v. Pope

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 14, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0079 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0079 GEB GGH P.

February 14, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's application.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's application within thirty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

2. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of an answer;

3. If the response to petitioner's application is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed within fifteen days thereafter; and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Shasta County Sheriff Jim Pope, 1500 Court Street, Redding CA 96001.


Summaries of

Mancus v. Pope

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 14, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0079 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Mancus v. Pope

Case Details

Full title:PETER J. MANCUS, Petitioner, v. JIM POPE, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 14, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0079 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2006)