From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mancini v. Unso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1941
263 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

November 24, 1941.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of consumption of pork infected with trichinae, and for loss of services and for expenses, order, in so far as it grants plaintiffs' motion for examination before trial of defendant Wilson Co., Inc., modified on the law by striking therefrom item "c" with respect to the scope of the examination of said defendant, and by striking from item "b" the word "might" and inserting in place thereof the words "was intended to." As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days notice. There is no allegation in the complaint which would make item "c" a material subject of inquiry. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mancini v. Unso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1941
263 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Mancini v. Unso

Case Details

Full title:ADELE MANCINI and VINCENZO MANCINI, Respondents, v. JOHN UNSO, Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1941

Citations

263 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

POSNER v. NOVA TABLE PAD CO

A party is limited in its examination before trial to matters material to the issues raised by the pleadings.…