From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mancina v. Hackard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2007
MISC S-07-0100 MCE GGH (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2007)

Opinion

MISC S-07-0100 MCE GGH.

November 5, 2007


ORDER


Previously pending on this court's law and motion calendar for November 1, 2007, was defendant Holt's motion to extend duration of the deposition of non-party witness David Smith beyond seven hours. Attorney David Zarka specially appeared for defendant Holt. Counsel Jack Vetter appeared by telephone for non-party David Smith and filed a response. Third party defendant Todd Lindley also appeared by telephone. Counsel for plaintiff made no appearance.

For the reasons stated at hearing, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. On or before November 13, 2007, the parties shall file a copy of a stipulated order to extend discovery in the Missouri case, or file evidence indicating that a motion for extension of discovery has been filed in the Western District of Missouri. The court will then determine whether further argument is necessary before ruling on the motion.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve Jack Vetter, counsel for non-party David Smith, with this order.


Summaries of

Mancina v. Hackard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2007
MISC S-07-0100 MCE GGH (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Mancina v. Hackard

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL S. MANCINA, M.D. ASSOCIATES, P.A., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL A…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 5, 2007

Citations

MISC S-07-0100 MCE GGH (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2007)