From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manchanda Law Office PLLC v. Marin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 15, 2020
189 A.D.3d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12639N Index No. 652477/19 Case No. 2020-02426

12-15-2020

MANCHANDA LAW OFFICE PLLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Vitalie MARIN, Defendant–Respondent.

L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, LLP, Garden City (Marian C. Rice of counsel), and Monarch Law Group, New York (Robert G. Androsiglio of counsel), for appellant. Max Smelyansky, Albany, for respondent.


L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, LLP, Garden City (Marian C. Rice of counsel), and Monarch Law Group, New York (Robert G. Androsiglio of counsel), for appellant.

Max Smelyansky, Albany, for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Gische, Gonza´lez, Scarpulla, Mendez, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered November 1, 2019, which, in this action seeking a de novo review of a fee dispute arbitration, granted defendant's motion to change of venue from New York County to Albany County pursuant to CPLR 510(3), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There exists no basis to disturb the motion court's decision to change venue to Albany County on the grounds that the convenience of nonparty witnesses and the interests of justice would be better served by a change of venue. Defendant supported the motion with affidavits from three witnesses based in Albany County, which showed that they are available and willing to testify on behalf of the movant, the nature of their testimony and the manner in which it is material to issues raised in the case, and the manner in which they would be inconvenienced if required to travel to New York County (see Marcus v. Jason & Bill's Pool Serv., 178 A.D.3d 546, 111 N.Y.S.3d 857 [1st Dept. 2019] ). Plaintiff did not identify, in opposition, factors that would justify retention of venue in New York County, such as by showing that any, let alone the preponderance of, the material nonparty witnesses to the fee dispute are located in there (see Ryan–Avizienis v. JBEW Bar Corp., 121 A.D.3d 579, 993 N.Y.S.2d 912 [1st Dept. 2014] ).


Summaries of

Manchanda Law Office PLLC v. Marin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 15, 2020
189 A.D.3d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Manchanda Law Office PLLC v. Marin

Case Details

Full title:Manchanda Law Office PLLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vitalie Marin…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 15, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
189 A.D.3d 544
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7501