From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mancaruso v. Cuthbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

June, 1928.


Order denying motion to vacate subpoena reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the subpoena vacated and set aside, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the proceeding had lapsed and no jurisdiction existed for the issuance of the subpoena, and the proceeding could not be revived without notice to the judgment debtor. ( Matter of Wilson v. Bracken, Nos. 1 2, 150 App. Div. 577.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mancaruso v. Cuthbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Mancaruso v. Cuthbert

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Proceedings Supplementary to Execution: FELICE MANCARUSO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1928

Citations

224 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)