From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manago v. William

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2010
No. 2:07cv2290-LKK-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:07cv2290-LKK-KJN-P.

November 16, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 21, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 21, 2010 (Dkt. No. 93), are adopted in full.

2. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 87) is denied.

3. Plaintiff's motion for protective order (Dkt. No. 86) is denied.

4. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 88) is denied.

DATED: November 16, 2010.


Summaries of

Manago v. William

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2010
No. 2:07cv2290-LKK-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Manago v. William

Case Details

Full title:STEWART MANAGO, Plaintiff, v. BRAD WILLIAM, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 16, 2010

Citations

No. 2:07cv2290-LKK-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2010)