From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manago v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0966 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0966 GGH P

07-10-2012

STEWART MANAGO, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. Doc. 5. On May 1, 2012, the court denied plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis as he was three strikes barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff was provided 28 days to pay the filing fee in full or this case would be dismissed. Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration that was denied, but has not paid the filing fee. Therefore, this case is dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Manago v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0966 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Manago v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:STEWART MANAGO, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 10, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0966 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2012)