Opinion
May 10, 1976
In an action on an insurance policy, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated April 7, 1975, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the instant complaint fails to state a cause of action on a third-party beneficiary theory (cf. Embler v Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection Ins. Co., 158 N.Y. 431; Jefferson v Sinclair Refining Co., 14 A.D.2d 238, affd 10 N.Y.2d 422; Duffy v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 58 Misc.2d 855; Browdy v State-Wide Ins. Co., 56 Misc.2d 610). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.