From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malus v. Sperry Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 24, 1953
282 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

November 24, 1953.

Present — Cohn, J.P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent, with leave to the plaintiff to renew application for examination on specific items to be requested. The mere fact that this is a libel action is not determinative of the question of plaintiff's right to an examination. We note that the libel alleged here is not one that received general publication and that, therefore, there may be difficulty in ascertaining both its extent and effect.


Summaries of

Malus v. Sperry Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 24, 1953
282 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Malus v. Sperry Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MALUS, Appellant v. SPERRY CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Nomako v. Ashton

Of course, limited examinations in defamation cases had been permitted under special circumstances. For…

Manacher v. Central Coal Co.

The limitation of the examination, at this time, to that of Irving A. Manacher, represents a proper exercise…