From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maltbia v. Tribley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-13099 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-13099

10-04-2011

RIZELL EUGENE MALTBIA, #245366, Petitioner, v. LINDA TRIBLEY, Respondent.


HONORABLE

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's pleading entitled "Remedial Filing and Reconsideration for Writ of Habeas Corpus" concerning the Court's non-prejudicial dismissal of his habeas petition for failure to fully exhaust his state court remedies as to all of the grounds asserted in support of his request for habeas relief. Petitioner contends that the Court erred in summarily dismissing his petition.

Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1 provides that a motion for reconsideration only should be granted if the movant demonstrates that the Court and the parties have been misled by a palpable defect and that a different disposition of the case must result from a correction of such a palpable defect. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(h). A motion that merely presents the same issues already ruled upon by the Court shall not be granted. Id. For the reasons that follow, Petitioner fails to demonstrate that the Court committed a palpable defect, the correction of which would result in a different disposition of his petition.

A federal district court has the authority to summarily dismiss a habeas petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1); Prather v. Rees, 822 F.2d 1418, 1422 (6th Cir. 1987); Benoit v. Bock, 237 F. Supp. 2d 804, 806 (E.D. Mich. 2003); see also O'Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 845, 119 S. Ct. 1728, 1731 (1999) ("state prisoners must give the state courts one full fair opportunity to resolve any constitutional issues by invoking one complete round of the State's established appellate review process"); Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 522, 102 S. Ct. 1198, 1205 (1982) (stating total exhaustion rule). Petitioner fails to demonstrate in his pending motion that he exhausted his state court remedies prior to filing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Thus the dismissal of his petition without prejudice was proper.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, that Petitioner's Remedial Filing and Reconsideration for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copy to:

Rizell Eugene Maltbia, #245366

Ojibway Correctional Facility

N. 5705 Ojibway Road

Marenisco, MI 49947


Summaries of

Maltbia v. Tribley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-13099 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Maltbia v. Tribley

Case Details

Full title:RIZELL EUGENE MALTBIA, #245366, Petitioner, v. LINDA TRIBLEY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-13099 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2011)