From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maloof v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2018
Case No. 8:16-cv-01880-SK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2018)

Summary

affirming ALJ's assessment of treating physician's opinion, even where claimant cited to evidence in support of the opinion, where ALJ found the opinion was conclusory because the physician "provid[ed] very little explanation of the evidence relied on in forming [it]" (alteration in original)

Summary of this case from Nancy M. v. Saul

Opinion

Case No. 8:16-cv-01880-SK

01-22-2018

EDWARD JOSEPH MALOOF, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is the judgment of this Court that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is AFFIRMED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant. Date: January 22, 2018

/s/_________

HON. STEVE KIM

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Maloof v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 22, 2018
Case No. 8:16-cv-01880-SK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2018)

affirming ALJ's assessment of treating physician's opinion, even where claimant cited to evidence in support of the opinion, where ALJ found the opinion was conclusory because the physician "provid[ed] very little explanation of the evidence relied on in forming [it]" (alteration in original)

Summary of this case from Nancy M. v. Saul
Case details for

Maloof v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD JOSEPH MALOOF, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 22, 2018

Citations

Case No. 8:16-cv-01880-SK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2018)

Citing Cases

Nancy M. v. Saul

The ALJ properly discounted Dr. Reid's opinion on the basis that her assessment was inconsistent with the…