From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malone v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 15, 1925
106 So. 921 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

1 Div. 637.

November 24, 1925. Rehearing Denied December 15, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Monroe County; John D. Leigh, Judge.

Bill Malone was convicted of violating the prohibition laws, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Malone v. State, 106 So. 912.

214 Ala. 699.

Hybart Hare, of Monroeville, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Counsel argue for error in rulings on the trial, but without citing authorities.

There was sufficient evidence to support the verdict; the affirmative charge was properly refused. Arthur v. State, 19 Ala. App. 311, 97 So. 158.


The appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully having in his possession a still, etc. There was ample evidence to support the verdict returned. Walker v. State, 19 Ala. App. 20, 95 So. 205; Gilbert v. State, 19 Ala. App. 104, 95 So. 502; White v. State, 18 Ala. App. 275, 91 So. 888; Layman v. State, 18 Ala. App. 441, 93 So. 66; Williams v. State, 18 Ala. App. 286, 92 So. 28; Johnson v. State, 18 Ala. App. 72, 88 So. 353. We have examined each of the few exceptions reserved upon the admission or rejection of testimony, and find no merit in any of them. The rulings in each case involved only elementary principles of law, which have been many times discussed by this court. The defendant appears to have had a fair trial, and, no prejudicial error anywhere appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Malone v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 15, 1925
106 So. 921 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Malone v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bill MALONE v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Dec 15, 1925

Citations

106 So. 921 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
21 Ala. App. 684

Citing Cases

Malone v. State

SOMERVILLE, J. Petition of Bill Malone for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the…