From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malone v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 31, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2046 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2046 GEB CKD P.

October 31, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 26, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 26, 2011 are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant Adams is dismissed.

Dated: October 28, 2011


Summaries of

Malone v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 31, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2046 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Malone v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD T. MALONE, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2046 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)