Summary
finding that exclusive federal jurisdiction did not erase the requirement that all defendants must join in the notice of removal
Summary of this case from Pix v. AlperOpinion
Civil No. 06-1629-AS.
March 13, 2007
Eric K. Helmy, The Helmy Law Firm, P.C., Portland, Oregon, Attorney for Plaintiff.
Truman A. Stone, Brown Tarlow Bridges Palmer, P.C., Newberg, Oregon. Beth A. Cupani, David D. VanSpeybroeck, Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C., Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Defendants.
ORDER
The Honorable Donald Ashmanskas, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on February 20, 2007. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas' Findings and Recommendation (#30).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (#14) is granted. This action is remanded to the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Yamhill County.