From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malone v. City of Silverhill

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Feb 1, 1991
575 So. 2d 107 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991)

Summary

In Malone, this Court held that the admission of evidence of scientific test results without the laying of a proper predicate was not harmless.

Summary of this case from Hutcherson v. State

Opinion

1 Div. 918.

February 1, 1991.

Appeal from Baldwin Circuit Court.


AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA


In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex parte Malone, 575 So.2d 106 (Ala. 1990), the judgement in this cause is reversed, and this cause is remanded to the circuit court for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Malone v. City of Silverhill

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Feb 1, 1991
575 So. 2d 107 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991)

In Malone, this Court held that the admission of evidence of scientific test results without the laying of a proper predicate was not harmless.

Summary of this case from Hutcherson v. State
Case details for

Malone v. City of Silverhill

Case Details

Full title:Ruben Max MALONE v. CITY OF SILVERHILL

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 1, 1991

Citations

575 So. 2d 107 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Hutcherson v. State

We realize that the courts in this state have stated that "overwhelming evidence of guilt does not render…