Opinion
Case No. 5D21-2493.
05-12-2023
Roger MALOCH, Appellant, v. Laura DAVIS f/k/a Laura Maloch, Appellee.
William S. Graessle , of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. Rebecca Bowen Creed , of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.
William S. Graessle , of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Rebecca Bowen Creed , of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
LAMBERT, C.J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.
EISNAUGLE, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, with opinion.
EISNAUGLE, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Former Husband argues, inter alia, that a miscalculation of alimony appears on the face of the judgment. I agree, but I cannot discern if the miscalculation is in the trial court's assessment of Former Wife's need or in the alimony amount itself. Therefore, I would reverse for the trial court to reconsider both calculations. See Poropat v. Poropat, 54 So.3d 507, 508 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) ("[W]e reverse and remand to the trial court to correct the mathematical error which is reflected on the face of the order." (citation omitted)). I would otherwise affirm.