Mallari v. Nat'l Consumer Telecom & Utils. Exch.

Full title: JONALETTE MALLARI, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL CONSUMER TELECOM & UTILITIES…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 20, 2022

2:22-cv-01365-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01365-CDS-DJA

10-20-2022

JONALETTE MALLARI, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL CONSUMER TELECOM & UTILITIES EXCHANGE, INC., COX COMMUNICATIONS LAS VEGAS, INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC. AND BACKGROUNDCHECK.COM LLC, Defendants.

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC MICHAEL N. FEDER Nevada Bar No. 7332 GABRIEL A. BLUMBERG Nevada Bar No. 12332 Attorneys for Defendant Cox Communications KIND LAW MICHAEL KIND, NV Bar #13903 GEORGE HAINES, NV Bar #9411 GERARDO AVALOS, NV Bar #15171 FREEDOM LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiff Jonalette Mallari Ramir M. Hernandez WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK LLP Attorneys for DIRECTV, LLC Gia N. Marina CLARK HILL PLLC Attorneys for National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc.

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC

MICHAEL N. FEDER Nevada Bar No. 7332

GABRIEL A. BLUMBERG Nevada Bar No. 12332

Attorneys for Defendant Cox Communications

KIND LAW

MICHAEL KIND, NV Bar #13903

GEORGE HAINES, NV Bar #9411

GERARDO AVALOS, NV Bar #15171

FREEDOM LAW FIRM

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jonalette Mallari

Ramir M. Hernandez WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK LLP

Attorneys for DIRECTV, LLC

Gia N. Marina CLARK HILL PLLC

Attorneys for National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COX COMMUNICATIONS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES UNDER THE FRCA, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 [SECOND REQUEST]

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant Cox Communications (“Cox”), by and through its attorneys, Dickinson Wright PLLC, and Plaintiff Jonalette Mallari (“Plaintiff'), by and through Plaintiffs attorneys, Kind Law and Freedom Law Firm, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Plaintiffs Complaint for Damages under FCRA, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 was filed on August 23, 2022, [ECF 1], (the “Complaint”).

2. Plaintiff served Cox on August 25, 2022.

3. Pursuant to the Stipulation and Order approved by the Court on September 1, 2022, [ECF 5], Cox's deadline to respond, move or otherwise pleads to the Complaint was extended to October 21, 2022.

4. Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed that Cox shall have up to an including November 21, 2022, to respond, move or otherwise pleads to the Complaint.

5. This second request for an extension is so that Cox can continue reviewing its records pertaining to the allegations in the Complaint.

6. This is second stipulation between Plaintiff and Cox to extend the time for Cox to respond, move or otherwise plead to the Complaint and it is not being entered into for purposes of any delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

An Employee of Dickinson Wright PLLC