From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mallano v. Chiang

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Oct 15, 2018
S250379 (Cal. Oct. 15, 2018)

Opinion

S250379

10-15-2018

MALLANO (ROBERT) v. CHIANG (JOHN)


B285285/B272124/B276842 Second Appellate District, Div. 2

Order filed

The justices of this court, having determined recusal is appropriate in the present posture of the above-captioned matter, hereby recuse themselves.

Pursuant to California Constitution, article VI, section 6, subdivision (e), Code of Civil Procedure, section 170.8, and the established procedure set out in the Internal Operating Practices and Procedures of the California Supreme Court, section IV.J., a subsequent order, to be filed as soon as possible, is contemplated, assigning other judicial officers who first took judicial office on or after July 1, 2017, to adjudicate the pending petition for review. (See Mosk v. Superior Court (1979) 25 Cal.3d 474, 480-483; Carma Developers (Cal.), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 342, 350, fn. 1; Schwarzenegger v. California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District (S189114) [Dec. 21 & 22, 2010, orders recusing and assigning replacement justices].)


Summaries of

Mallano v. Chiang

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Oct 15, 2018
S250379 (Cal. Oct. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Mallano v. Chiang

Case Details

Full title:MALLANO (ROBERT) v. CHIANG (JOHN)

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Oct 15, 2018

Citations

S250379 (Cal. Oct. 15, 2018)