From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malin v. Bill Wolf Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 2000
272 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued April 3, 2000.

May 22, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover the costs incurred in cleaning up petroleum contamination, the defendants Bill Wolf Petroleum Corp., Rte. 109 Service Stations, Inc., 2001 First Avenue Corp., Gasoline Realty Agent, Inc., B.W. Realty Corp., and Cary Wolf appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated April 6, 1999, as granted the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment against them on the issue of liability, and denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff was precluded from bringing the action.

Pirro, Collier, Cohen Halpern, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Steven H. Gaines of counsel), for appellants.

D. L. Rothberg Associates, P.C. (Debra L. Rothberg and Sarah P. Flanagan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, SONDRA MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff established by sufficient evidence that the appellants were "dischargers" who contributed to the contamination of the subject property. Thus, there are no material issues of fact regarding their liability for the contamination under Navigation Law § 181(5) (see, Leone v. Leewood Serv. Sta., 212 A.D.2d 669, 671; 145 Kisco Ave. Corp. v. Dufner Enters., 198 A.D.2d 482, 483; Domermuth Petroleum Equip. Maintnance Corp. v. Herzog Hopkins, 111 A.D.2d 957, 959). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment.

The appellants' remaining contention is without merit.

MANGANO, P.J., BRACKEN, S. MILLER and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Malin v. Bill Wolf Petroleum Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 2000
272 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Malin v. Bill Wolf Petroleum Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE L. MALIN, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. BILL WOLF PETROLEUM CORP., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 22, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 888

Citing Cases

Steuben Contracting v. Griffith Oil Company

the motion of defendant Chevron USA, Inc. (Chevron) for summary judgment dismissing the fourth amended…

State of New York v. McGrane

Contrary to the contention of the defendant James McGrane, the president and sole shareholder of the…