From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malik v. Conocophillips Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 23, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12-cv-655 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12-cv-655

06-23-2014

OMAR MALIK (a/k/a IKE PORTER, a/k/a IAKE PORTER), Plaintiff, v. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, DARREN PRATKA, SHANDY HILBURN, EDWARD TOTH, JOSEPHINE MILLER, SENDERO RESOURCES INC., TED W. WALTERS & ASSOCIATES L.P., and GEO-VEST, INC., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of this case has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 47) recommends that Defendants ConocoPhillips and Sendero Resources' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 37 & 39) be granted and that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). Additionally, it is recommended that Plaintiff's fraud, negligent misrepresentation, trespass, and taking of real property claims against Defendants Geo-Vest, Inc., Josephine Miller, and Darren Pratka be dismissed because the applicable statute of limitations has expired. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 16.003(a); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 16.004(a)(4).

An acknowledgment of receipt card (Doc. No. 48) reveals that Plaintiff received the Report and Recommendation on May 17, 2014. No written objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court.

In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

__________

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Malik v. Conocophillips Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 23, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12-cv-655 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Malik v. Conocophillips Co.

Case Details

Full title:OMAR MALIK (a/k/a IKE PORTER, a/k/a IAKE PORTER), Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Jun 23, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12-cv-655 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2014)

Citing Cases

Douglass v. Douglass (In re Stephen Charles Douglass XXX-XX-7094 & Kimberly Ann Douglass XXX-XX-3739)

J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. JWJ Mgmt. Inc., 324 S.W.3d 823 (Tex. App.- Fort Worth 2010, no pet.); Malik…

Cooper v. Green Tree Servicing LLC

The TTLA does not specify a limitations period, but courts have applied the two-year statute of limitations…