From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 29, 2019
18 Civ. 5608 (PAC) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2019)

Opinion

18 Civ. 5608 (PAC)

04-29-2019

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address: 207.38.134.2, Defendant.


OPINION & ORDER :

Plaintiff moves for leave to file a third-party subpoena on Defendant John Doe's Internet Service Provider, RCN Corporation ("RCN") in advance of the conference mandated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). (Dkt. 11). The Court concludes that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on an expedited basis, see Arista Records, LLC v. Doe, 604 F.3d 110, 115 (2d Cir. 2010), and GRANTS Plaintiff's motion.

This case, however, raises special concerns about protecting Defendant's privacy given both the nature of the copyrighted material, see Digital Sins, Inc. v. John Does 1-245, No. 11 Civ. 8170, 2012 WL 1744838, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. May 15, 2012); Next Phase Distribution, Inc. v. Does 1-138, No. 11 Civ. 9706, 2012 WL 691830, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2012), and the risk of false identification by Defendant's ISP. See Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-5, No. 12 Civ. 2950, 2012 WL 2001968, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 1, 2012) ("The fact that a copyrighted work was illegally downloaded from a certain IP address does not necessarily mean that the owner of the IP address was the infringer.").

In light of those concerns, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the Defendant may proceed anonymously as John Does unless and until the Court orders otherwise;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall not initiate settlement discussions prior to service of the Complaint without leave of Court. If Defendant initiates such discussion, Plaintiff is permitted to participate therein and settle the case;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is allowed to conduct immediate discovery on RCN with a subpoena under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 seeking John Doe's name and current and permanent address. Plaintiff is not permitted to subpoena RCN for Defendant's email address or phone number. The subpoena shall have a copy of this Order attached.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall immediately serve a copy of this Order on RCN and that RCN shall serve a copy of this Order on John Doe. RCN may serve John Doe using any reasonable means, including written notice sent to John Doe's last known address, transmitted either by first-class mail or via overnight service.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that John Doe shall have 60 days from the date of sendee of this Order upon him or her to file any motions with this Court contesting the subpoena (including a motion to quash or modify the subpoena). RCN may not turn over John Doe's identifying information to Plaintiff before the expiration of this 60-day period. Additionally, if John Doe or RCN files a motion to quash the subpoena, RCN may not turn over any information to Plaintiff until the issues have been addressed and the Court issues an order instructing RCN to resume in turning over the requested discovery.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if that 60-day period lapses without John Doe or RCN contesting the subpoena, RCN shall have 10 days to produce the information responsive to the subpoena to Plaintiff. If John Doe moves to quash or modify the subpoena, or to proceed anonymously, he or she shall at the same time as his or her filing also notify RCN so that RCN is on notice not to release John Doe's contact information to Plaintiff until the Court rules on any such motions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that RCN shall preserve any subpoenaed information pending the resolution of any timely motion to quash.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that RCN shall confer with Plaintiff and shall not assess any charge in advance of providing the information requested in the subpoena. If RCN elects to charge for the costs of production, it shall provide a billing summary and cost report to Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any information ultimately disclosed to Plaintiff in response to a Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 subpoena may be used by Plaintiff solely for the purpose of protecting its rights as set forth in its Complaint,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's time to serve the Summons and Complaint on Defendant is extended to forty-five days after Plaintiff receives the information from the ISP pursuant to subpoena. (See Dkts. 16, 18 & 19).

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motions at Dkts. 11, 16, 18 & 19. Dated: New York, New York

April 29, 2019

SO ORDERED

/s/_________

PAUL A. CROTTY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 29, 2019
18 Civ. 5608 (PAC) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 29, 2019

Citations

18 Civ. 5608 (PAC) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2019)