From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malibu Media, LLC v. Romer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 10, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03190-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-03190-WYD-MEH

07-10-2014

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN ROMER, Defendant.


Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel


ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Hegarty's Recommendation that the District Court enter default against Defendant Kevin Romer (ECF No. 29). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Magistrate Judge Hegarty advised the parties that written objections were due within fourteen (14) days after service of a copy of the Recommendation. (Recommendation at 1). Despite this advisement, no objections were filed to the Recommendation. No objections having been filed, I am vested with discretion to review the Recommendation "under any standard [I] deem[] appropriate." Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating that "[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings"). Nonetheless, though not required to do so, I review the Recommendation to "satisfy [my]self that there is no clear error on the face of the record." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) Advisory Committee Notes.

Note, this standard of review is something less than a "clearly erroneous or contrary to law" standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Having reviewed the Recommendation, I am satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. I find that Magistrate Judge Hegarty's Recommendation is thorough, well-reasoned and sound. I agree with Magistrate Judge Hegarty that a default should enter in favor of the Plaintiff and against Defendant Kevin Romer for the reasons stated in both the Recommendation and this Order.

Based on the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Hegarty (ECF No. 29) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. In accordance therewith, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter default in Plaintiff's favor against Defendant Kevin Romer for Defendant's failure to comply with court orders and defend this action by failing to participate in the Rule 26(f) conference, failing to appear at the Scheduling Conference held on May 13, 2014, and failing to respond to this Court's order to show cause.

BY THE COURT:

__________

WILEY Y. DANIEL,

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Malibu Media, LLC v. Romer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 10, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-03190-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Malibu Media, LLC v. Romer

Case Details

Full title:MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN ROMER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 10, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-03190-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 10, 2014)