Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02392-REB-MEH
11-15-2012
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegart y, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 14, 2012.
Before the Court is Defendant Doe #3's Motion that the Court (1) Reconsider its Order Granting Early Discovery (2) Sever all John Does Other than John Doe No. 1, and (3) Quash Outstanding Subpoenas [filed November 12, 2012; docket #30].
Due to its varied requests for relief, adjudication of the single motion will likely require several different standards of review and legal analyses of both dispositive and non-dispositive issues. In the interests of judicial efficiency and the proper management of its docket, the Court denies the motion without prejudice and instructs the Defendant to file his requests for relief each in separate motions, as applicable. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1C ("A motion shall be made in a separate paper.")
Further, the Court notes that it has already ruled that this Court has no jurisdiction to quash the subpoena challenged by Doe #3 (docket #29), and Doe #3 makes no argument in the present motion rebutting the well-settled law or asking the Court to reconsider its order.