From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malekan v. City Harvest, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1996
234 A.D.2d 94 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 10, 1996.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered on or about May 14, 1996, which, in a rear-end accident case, denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


The parties' conflicting versions of the accident raise triable issue of fact, including whether, as plaintiff claims, his vehicle was stopped for some length of time prior to the accident or whether, as defendants claim, plaintiff suddenly stopped his vehicle without reason or warning ( see, Tann v Herlands, 224 AD2d 230), and whether defendant driver had been tailgating in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 (a), and, if so, whether such was a proximate cause of the accident ( see, Darmento v Pacific Molasses Co., 81 NY2d 985).


Summaries of

Malekan v. City Harvest, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1996
234 A.D.2d 94 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Malekan v. City Harvest, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MANOUCHER MALEKAN et al., Appellants, v. CITY HARVEST, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 94 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 295

Citing Cases

Woodley v. Ramirez

Notably, plaintiff Borden's deposition testimony established that the limousine pulled out in front of…

Lumley v. General Mills, Inc.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.). Triable issues of fact remain concerning whether…