From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malec v. Halter

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 17, 1969
216 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 68-422.

December 10, 1968. Rehearing Denied January 17, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Francis X. Knuck, J.

Howard A. Rose, Cristol Rose and Charles Appel, Miami, for appellant.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner Hardy, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.


Appellant [plaintiff in the trial court] seeks review of a favorable jury verdict, contending that the trial judge committed error when he refused to permit medical bills [incurred as a result of an alleged accident] to be introduced by the plaintiff, who was a married woman.

At common law, the prevailing party plaintiff could not seek review of a favorable verdict. This has been modified in this State by judicial rulings. Paul v. Kanter, Fla.App. 1963, 155 So.2d 402; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 10. A condition permitting a plaintiff [recovering a favorable verdict] to seek appellate review is that a motion for new trial be addressed to the trial court urging inadequacy of the verdict. Guarria v. State Road Department of Florida, Fla.App. 1960, 117 So.2d 5; Paul v. Kanter, supra. This was not done in the instant case and, therefore, we do not disturb the verdict and final judgment here under review.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Malec v. Halter

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 17, 1969
216 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

Malec v. Halter

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA MALEC, APPELLANT, v. MILLICENT HALTER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 17, 1969

Citations

216 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

Vega v. Cosmopolitan Mutual Ins. Co.

The judgment must be affirmed upon the authority of the rule stated in Morrison v. Bohne, Fla.App. 1973, 274…

O'Leary v. Watson

No motion for new trial was filed. In Malec v. Halter, Fla.App. 1969, 216 So.2d 782, with regard to necessity…