From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maldonado v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
1:11-cv-01735 SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01735 SKO (PC)

10-20-2011

BILLY RAY MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. JAMES YATES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SUBMIT SIGNED

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE

WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. However, plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis was deficient because it did not include plaintiff's required original signature. Each document submitted for filing must include the original signature of the filing party or parties. Local Rule 131; F.R.C.P. 11(a).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall re-submit the enclosed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with plaintiff's original signature, or in the alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action. Plaintiff is not required to submit another certified copy of his prison trust account statement.

Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Maldonado v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
1:11-cv-01735 SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Maldonado v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:BILLY RAY MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. JAMES YATES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-01735 SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)