From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maldonado v. Westchester Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 2, 2021
18 CIVIL 11410 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2021)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 11410 (PMH)

02-02-2021

ANTHONY MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated February 2, 2021, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. While "[d]istrict courts should frequently provide leave to amend before dismissing a pro se complaint...leave to amend is not necessary when it would be futile." Reed v. Friedman Mgt. Corp., 541 F.App'x 40, 41 (2d Cir. 2013) (citing Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000)). Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as any amendment would be futile; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

February 2, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Maldonado v. Westchester Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 2, 2021
18 CIVIL 11410 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Maldonado v. Westchester Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 2, 2021

Citations

18 CIVIL 11410 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2021)