Opinion
No. CIV S-10-1944 DAD P
09-21-2011
JULIO MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ et al., Defendants.
ORDER
On August 9, 2011, defendant Gandy filed a motion to dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and unenumerated Rule 12(b). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." On May 10, 2011, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion.
Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." In the order filed April 20, 2011, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendants' motion to dismiss. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
DALE A. DROZD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE