From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maldonado v. Law Office of Bjork

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 2, 2009
64 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 986.

July 2, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander Hunter, Jr., J.), entered December 26, 2008, which, to the extent appealable, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

Shapiro, Beilly, Rosenberg Aronowitz, LLP, New York (Roy J. Karlin of counsel), for appellant.

Dominick W. Lavelle, Mineola, for respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, McGuire, Acosta and Richter, JJ.


In December 2006, just before the statute of limitations expired (CPLR 214), plaintiff commenced this action naming as sole defendant the driver of a car that had allegedly struck Plaintiff's car, injuring plaintiff. However, that driver had died in December 2004. After trying to identify an administrator of the driver's estate and starting a second action against the driver's wife, on the mistaken belief that she was the administrator of his estate, plaintiff moved to substitute, as a party defendant, the law firm assigned to this matter by the deceased driver's liability insurer. That motion was granted on default and the court subsequently denied the law firm's motion to vacate the default and dismiss the complaint.

Since one cannot commence an action against a deceased person, this action was a nullity from its inception ( see Marte v Graber, 58 AD3d 1, 2-3). Consequently, the motion court lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the initial action and erred in denying defendant's motion to dismiss. Concur.


Summaries of

Maldonado v. Law Office of Bjork

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 2, 2009
64 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Maldonado v. Law Office of Bjork

Case Details

Full title:Luis A. MALDONADO, Respondent, v. THE LAW OFFICE OF MARY A. BJORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 2, 2009

Citations

64 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5637
882 N.Y.S.2d 118

Citing Cases

Cnty. of Orange v. Goldman (In re Foreclosure of Tax Liens)

Furthermore, the County's act of amending the caption of the void petition to eliminate the names of the…

Rivera v. Bruchim

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and the order is vacated. The death of…