From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maldonado v. Flannery

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 27, 2020
335 Conn. 967 (Conn. 2020)

Opinion

10-27-2020

William MALDONADO et al. v. Kelly C. FLANNERY et al.

Philip F. von Kuhn, in support of the petition. Jack G. Steigelfest, Hartford, in opposition.


Philip F. von Kuhn, in support of the petition.

Jack G. Steigelfest, Hartford, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 200 Conn. App. 1, 238 A.3d 127 (2020), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had abused its discretion in ordering additurs in favor of both of the plaintiffs?"

KELLER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Maldonado v. Flannery

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 27, 2020
335 Conn. 967 (Conn. 2020)
Case details for

Maldonado v. Flannery

Case Details

Full title:William MALDONADO et al. v. Kelly C. FLANNERY et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 27, 2020

Citations

335 Conn. 967 (Conn. 2020)
240 A.3d 284

Citing Cases

Maldonado v. Flannery

We granted the plaintiffs’ petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the…