From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maldonado v. California

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-1782 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1782 WBS AC P

12-20-2021

BILLY RAY SHANEE MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 10, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 10.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations issued November 10, 2021 (ECF No. 9), are ADOPTED in full;

2. Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and 3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Maldonado v. California

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-1782 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Maldonado v. California

Case Details

Full title:BILLY RAY SHANEE MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1782 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)