From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maldonado v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-2283-AP (D. Colo. Mar. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-2283-AP

03-08-2012

LORRAINE B. MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge John L. Kane


ORDER

KANE, J. ORDERS

The court is in receipt of plaintiff's filing, dated January 18, 2012, but not filed with the court until March 7, 2012. This filing, actually entitled "Why I Disagree with Disabilities' Decision" is construed as Plaintiff's Opening Brief. The Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. The defendant has already filed a response brief, which leaves only plaintiff's reply brief to be filed. The due date for that reply brief is March 22, 2012. If plaintiff wants to file a reply brief, she should do so no later than March 22, 2012. Whether or not a reply brief is filed is entirely up to the plaintiff. As is the normal procedure in administrative appeals, this case will be randomly assigned to a judge for consideration of the merits at the close of briefing.

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 8th day of March, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

JOHN L. KANE, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Maldonado v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-2283-AP (D. Colo. Mar. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Maldonado v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LORRAINE B. MALDONADO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-2283-AP (D. Colo. Mar. 8, 2012)