From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maldonado v. 1992 Fulton Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 2005
23 A.D.3d 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

6961.

November 1, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered April 16, 2004, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Herzfeld Rubin, P.C., New York (Neil R. Finkston of counsel), for appellant.

Budin, Reisman, Kupferberg Bernstein, LLP, New York (Scott B. Schwartz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ., Concur.


Even if defendant landowner complied with the applicable statutes and regulations, that circumstance would not, under the facts at bar, be dispositive of whether defendant discharged its common-law duty to maintain its premises in reasonably safe condition ( see Kellman v. 45 Tiemann Assoc., 87 NY2d 871; Swerdlow v. WSK Props. Corp., 5 AD3d 587). On the present record, a factfinder could infer that plaintiff's fall and injury were attributable to irregular, unrailed, or unlit building entry stairs.


Summaries of

Maldonado v. 1992 Fulton Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 2005
23 A.D.3d 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Maldonado v. 1992 Fulton Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN MALDONADO, Respondent, v. 1992 FULTON REALTY CORP., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8041
802 N.Y.S.2d 621

Citing Cases

Kimen v. False Alarm, Ltd.

The owner or possessor of property has a duty to maintain his or her property "in a reasonably safe condition…

Stasinos v. S.K.I, Realty Inc.

In addition, while it is unclear from the record whether the Building Code provisions cited by plaintiff's…