From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maldanado v. Lane, Comptroller

Supreme Court of Texas
May 20, 1914
167 S.W. 210 (Tex. 1914)

Opinion

No. 2605.

Decided May 20, 1914.

Mandamus — Question of Fact.

On the filing by respondent of an answer putting in issue facts relied on by relator for obtaining from the Supreme Court a writ of mandamus against the Comptroller, the application must be dismissed. (P. 350.)

Maldanado filed original petition in the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus against W.P. Lane as Comptroller, requiring issuance to relator of a license as retail liquor dealer.

James D. Walthall, for relator.

B.F. Looney, Attorney General, and W.A. Keeling, Assistant, for respondent.


The respondent has under oath denied the material allegations of the applicant for mandamus, which makes issues of fact which this court can not try, therefore the application is dismissed.


Summaries of

Maldanado v. Lane, Comptroller

Supreme Court of Texas
May 20, 1914
167 S.W. 210 (Tex. 1914)
Case details for

Maldanado v. Lane, Comptroller

Case Details

Full title:F. MALDANADO v. W.P. LANE, COMPTROLLER

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: May 20, 1914

Citations

167 S.W. 210 (Tex. 1914)
106 Tex. 350

Citing Cases

Natl Union Fire Ins v. Olson

The court held that the exempt status of the homestead is not affected by subsequent voluntary sale or…

Kimmons v. Abraham

The record shows that such constituents of the family survived the deceased as are necessary to take the…