Malcomson v. Monaton Realty Investing Corp.

1 Citing case

  1. Brookings v. Scudder

    295 Mo. 494 (Mo. 1922)   Cited 1 times

    85; 1 Corpus Juris, p. 181, par. 326; 18 Cyc. 239; Woerner American Law of Administration (2 Ed.) par. 328, p. 729; Bambrick v. Webster Groves Presbyterian Church, 53 Mo. App. 225; Arkansas Smelting Co. v. Belding, 127 U.S. 379. (5) The contract is valid: (a) The contract is not against public policy. Douglas v. Aurora Daily News Co., 160 Ill. App. 506; Oregon R. N. Co. v. Demaus, 181 F. 781; Bonta v. Gridley, 78 N.Y.S. 961; Strodl v. Farrish-Stafford Co., 130 N.Y.S. 35; Malcolmson v. Realty Inv. Co., 139 N.Y.S. 405; Fremont Carriage Co. v. Thompson, 91 N.Y. 376. (b) The contract is not void as in restraint of trade. Clark Marshall on Corporations, p. 1732; Skrainka v. Scharringhausen, 8 Mo. App. 522.