From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malcolm v. Stringer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 28, 2015
127 A.D.3d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

04-28-2015

In re Tyrone MALCOLM, Petitioner, v. Scott STRINGER, etc., et al., Respondents.

Virginia & Ambinder, LLP, New York (Lloyd R. Ambinder of counsel), for petitioner. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for Scott Stringer, respondent. Cozen O'Connor, New York (Stuart Shorenstein of counsel), for Allied Barton Security Services LLC and Allied Security, LLC, respondents.


Virginia & Ambinder, LLP, New York (Lloyd R. Ambinder of counsel), for petitioner.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for Scott Stringer, respondent.

Cozen O'Connor, New York (Stuart Shorenstein of counsel), for Allied Barton Security Services LLC and Allied Security, LLC, respondents.

Opinion In this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, the petition challenging a release issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the City of New York in connection with its final determination, dated July 10, 2014, that, among other things, respondent Allied–Barton Security Services LLC underpaid 143 of its employees prevailing wages in the total amount of $1,238,976.39 for the time period October 2010 through March 2013, unanimously granted to the extent of declaring that the release does not waive the right to pursue breach of contract claims for underpaid prevailing wages under contract No. 06H9503 prior to October 2010, and otherwise denied, without costs.

The ambiguous release has the meaning given to it by its drafter, the Comptroller (see Matter of Chesterfield Assoc. v. New York State Dept. of Labor, 4 N.Y.3d 597, 604, 797 N.Y.S.2d 389, 830 N.E.2d 287 [2005] [agency's determination and interpretation is entitled to deference] ), and discharges any claims for the underpayment of prevailing wages concerning contract no. 06H9503 with respect to the October 2010 through March 2013 time period. Accordingly, petitioner is not barred from pursuing breach of contract claims against Allied for the period prior to October 2010.

GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, RENWICK, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Malcolm v. Stringer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 28, 2015
127 A.D.3d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Malcolm v. Stringer

Case Details

Full title:In re Tyrone MALCOLM, Petitioner, v. Scott STRINGER, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 28, 2015

Citations

127 A.D.3d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 3463
5 N.Y.S.3d 874