From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malbory v. David Chevrolet Buick Pontiac, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 5, 2013
108 A.D.3d 1109 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-07-5

Rachelle MALBORY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID CHEVROLET BUICK PONTIAC, INC., Christen Smith, Defendants–Appellants, and Mattie Malbory, Defendant–Respondent.

Goldberg Segalla LLP, Buffalo (Arlow M. Linton of Counsel), for Defendants–Appellants. Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP, Buffalo (Robert J. Mullins, II, of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent.



Goldberg Segalla LLP, Buffalo (Arlow M. Linton of Counsel), for Defendants–Appellants. Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP, Buffalo (Robert J. Mullins, II, of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she sustained while she was a passenger in a vehicle driven by her mother, Mattie Malbory (defendant). That vehicle was involved in a collision with a vehicle driven by defendant Christen Smith and owned by defendant David Chevrolet Buick Pontiac, Inc. (collectively, Smith defendants), who now appeal from an order granting defendant's motion for, inter alia, summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against her. We affirm. It is well settled that a driver who has the right-of-way is entitled to anticipate that drivers of other vehicles will obey the traffic laws requiring them to yield ( see Liskiewicz v. Hameister, 104 A.D.3d 1194, 1194–1195, 961 N.Y.S.2d 665). Here, it is undisputed that the vehicle driven by defendant was traveling at a lawful rate of speed and had the right-of-way, and the Smith defendants failed to raise an issue of fact whether defendant had an opportunity to avoid the accident ( see id. at 1195, 961 N.Y.S.2d 665).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Malbory v. David Chevrolet Buick Pontiac, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 5, 2013
108 A.D.3d 1109 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Malbory v. David Chevrolet Buick Pontiac, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Rachelle MALBORY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID CHEVROLET BUICK PONTIAC, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 5, 2013

Citations

108 A.D.3d 1109 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
969 N.Y.S.2d 341
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5153

Citing Cases

Rolls v. State

In addition, there can be more than one proximate cause of an accident (Aloi v Ellis, 96 AD3d 1564 [4th Dept…

Heltz v. Barratt

With respect to appeal No. 2, we dismiss the appeal from the order therein to the extent that it denied leave…