Opinion
December, 1928.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seeger and Scudder, JJ.
Motion of plaintiff, respondent, to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Malafsky v. W.M. Ritter Flooring Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Summaries of
Malafsky v. W.M. Ritter Flooring Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for
Malafsky v. W.M. Ritter Flooring Corporation
Case Details
Full title:SAM MALAFSKY, Respondent, v. W.M. RITTER FLOORING CORPORATION, Respondent…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1928
Citations
225 App. Div. 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)