Opinion
Motion Nos. 2022-02929 2022-02978 2022-02976 Index Nos. 654508/19 Nos. 2021-02859 2022-02070 2022-03169
10-20-2022
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
PRESENT: Hon. Troy K. Webber, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Lizbeth González Saliann Scarpulla Bahaati E. Pitt, Justices.
Appeals having been taken to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about July 21, 2021 (Case No. 2021-02859), from an order, same Court, entered on or about November 15, 2021 (Case Nos. 2022-02070), and from an order, same Court, entered on or about March 28, 2022 (Case No. 2022-03169), And defendants-respondents having moved to vacate plaintiff's Notice of Appeal and dismiss the appeal taken from the November 15, 2021 order as having been taken from a nonappealable order (Case No. 2022-02070) [M-2022-02929], And plaintiff-appellant, pro se, having moved, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(c), to vacate the dismissal of the appeal taken under Case No. 2021-02859, to permit her to consolidate the three related appeals on a single record, and for an extension of time to perfect the consolidated appeals [M-2022-02978], And plaintiff-appellant, pro se, having moved, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(c), to vacate the dismissal of the appeal taken under Case No. 2021-02859, to permit her to perfect three related appeals on a single record (under Case Nos. 2021-02859, 2022-02070 and 2022-03169), and for an extension of time to perfect the appeals [M-2022-02976], Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motions, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is ordered that defendants' motion is granted to the extent of dismissing that branch of plaintiff's appeal taken under Case No. 2022-02070 concerning reargument, and is otherwise denied (M-2022-02929). Plaintiff's motions are granted to the extent of vacating the dismissal of the appeal taken under Case No. 2021-02859, extending the time in which to perfect her three appeals to the February 2023 Term of this Court, and are otherwise denied as unnecessary (see, 22 NYCRR 1250.9[f][3]) (M-2022-02978 & M-2022-02976).