From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Majorsky v. Douglas

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Jul 18, 2013
No. 101 WAL 2013 (Pa. Jul. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 101 WAL 2013

07-18-2013

PAUL MAJORSKY AND MARGARET A. MAJORSKY, Petitioners v. GEORGE A. DOUGLAS, AN INDIVIDUAL, J.C. NATALE, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND D.J. HESS ADVERTISING, A PARTNERSHIP, Respondents


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of July 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. The Application for Leave to File Supplemental Petition for Allowance of Appeal is also DENIED.


Summaries of

Majorsky v. Douglas

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Jul 18, 2013
No. 101 WAL 2013 (Pa. Jul. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Majorsky v. Douglas

Case Details

Full title:PAUL MAJORSKY AND MARGARET A. MAJORSKY, Petitioners v. GEORGE A. DOUGLAS…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 18, 2013

Citations

No. 101 WAL 2013 (Pa. Jul. 18, 2013)