From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Majors v. Pine

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 26, 2022
22-cv-01343-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-01343-RS (PR)

07-26-2022

WILLIE MAJORS, Plaintiff, v. DAVE PINE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RICHARD SEEBORG CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. (Dkt. No. 10.) Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN on the first page. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Majors v. Pine

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 26, 2022
22-cv-01343-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Majors v. Pine

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE MAJORS, Plaintiff, v. DAVE PINE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 26, 2022

Citations

22-cv-01343-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2022)