From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Major v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 5, 2009
3:99-cv-00237-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 5, 2009)

Opinion

3:99-cv-00237-LRH-RAM.

March 5, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is petitioner's motion for enlargement of time in which to file a reply to respondents' answer to the remaining claims contained in the petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket #86). Good cause appearing,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have up to and including May 15, 2009, in which to file and serve a reply to respondents' answer.


Summaries of

Major v. McDaniel

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 5, 2009
3:99-cv-00237-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Major v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY TODD MAJOR, Petitioner, v. E.K. McDANIEL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 5, 2009

Citations

3:99-cv-00237-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 5, 2009)