From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Major v. Dannelly

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Apr 14, 1920
220 S.W. 1110 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)

Opinion

No. 1626.

April 14, 1920.

Appeal from Dallas County Court; W. L. Thornton, Judge.

Action by W. W. Major and another against F. M. Dannelly. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff Major appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Short Field, of Dallas, for appellant.

Albert Walker, of Dallas, for appellee.


After the appellant had filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case, the appellee filed his briefs, asking for an affirmance, with damages for delay. The plaintiff in the court below, appellant here, recovered nothing in the lower court. There is no basis for the assessment of damages for delay. R.S. art. 1627; Hicks v. Murphy, 162 S.W. 925. Under the circumstances it can make no material difference to appellees whether the judgment be affirmed or the appeal dismissed.

We will therefore not take the time to examine into the questions of law necessary to determine whether there was any error in the judgment, but will sustain the appellant's motion and dismiss the appeal.


Summaries of

Major v. Dannelly

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Apr 14, 1920
220 S.W. 1110 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)
Case details for

Major v. Dannelly

Case Details

Full title:MAJOR v. DANNELLY

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo

Date published: Apr 14, 1920

Citations

220 S.W. 1110 (Tex. Civ. App. 1920)